Name:
|
Sherri
|
State: |
New Hampshire
|
Date of diagnosis: |
9/5/13
|
Age at time of diagnosis: |
46
|
Stage of diagnosis: |
Stage 3B
|
NORMAL mammogram: |
2011 |
How was cancer diagnosed: |
Puckering led to diagnosis/3D mammography followed by Ultrasound
|
In 1999, Sherri found a lump in her breast. She had a lumpectomy on the benign lesion and a marker was inserted. For the next two years, she was followed up with mammogram and ultrasound then yearly mammograms.
In 2011, Sherri's mammogram was NORMAL. Little did she know at the time, that a report from her radiologist to her referring doctor WHICH WAS NOT SHARED WITH HER stated 'Increased microcalcifications too numerous to count/Breast Tissue too dense to determine.'
Prior to her 3D mammogram in 2013, Sherri noticed a puckering in her left breast. The 3D revealed the lesion and subsequent ultrasound and biopsy confirmed breast cancer: Two 3.7 tumors,sentinel node positive for cancer - stage 3B. She has no family history for breast cancer and tested negative for a genetic mutation. Sherri has endured 13 surgeries, including a hysterectomy, had chemotherapy and radiation and is on Arimidex.
Sherri wonders why her doctors never informed her of the impact of her extremely dense tissue on detecting cancer by mammography in 2011. Why would information critical to her breast health AND revealed to her referring doctor, be withheld from her? Was the cancer hidden in dense tissue in 2011 when her mammogram was NORMAL? Could Sherri have averted a later stage diagnosis with numerous surgeries and aggressive treatments if adjunct screening was offered, avoiding a diminished quality of life?
Sherri is committed to Exposing the Secret of Dense Breast Tissue and is advocating for a density reporting law in New Hampshire to protect other women from a later stage diagnosis.